FORUM, Forum Discussion, Forum Gratuit, Nom de domaine, Nom de domaine gratuit, Redirection gratuite,

Forum Mounts Bay RFC Administrators :The Answer
Forum Mounts Bay RFC
Not logged | Login
Online:1 guest is browsing the forum
Register Register | Profile Profile | Private messages Private messages | Search Search | Online Online | Help Help | Create a free blog

forum Forum index forumOther Clubs forumNat 3 N v S

Author : Topic: Nat 3 N v S  Bottom
 DaveH
 Posts : 2478
 DaveH
  Posted 29/03/2008 08:04:44 PM
Send a private message to DaveH
What are the relative strengths of Nat3S and Nat3N?  

--Last edited by DaveH on 2008-03-29 20:45:20 --

I would give my right arm to be ambidextrous.
 The Druth Hurts
 Posts : 1004
 World Cup
 The Druth Hurts
  Posted 29/03/2008 11:24:34 PM
Send a private message to The Druth Hurts
Relatively speaking I have relatives in the South.  Does this help?

A wise man once said 'A little learning is a dangerous thing'.  I just wish I knew who it was.
 merlin
 Posts : 2433
 merlin
  Posted 30/03/2008 08:22:43 AM
Send a private message to merlin
I don't have any relatives up north i only know Dave up there.

Mounts Bay Rugby---Pride Of Penzance & Newlyn
 cheshire exile
 Posts : 277
 National League 1
 cheshire exile
  Posted 30/03/2008 12:04:19 AM
Send a private message to cheshire exile
Most clubs in nat 3 north are actually in the north[as opposed to midlands, ie Leicester Lions and Rugby] so travelling distances are less.

North seems more competitive; Tynedale well clear at top and Beverley adrift at bottom, bit much smaller points gap between 2nd and 13th than in 3 South.

Not sure what this says about quality of teams, though.

From limited exposure to 3 North, I would say crowds are definitely bigger in South.

Is anyone interested ?

keep the faith.
 Pirate Pig
 Posts : 123
 National League 2
  Posted 30/03/2008 12:29:57 AM
Send a private message to Pirate Pig
IF whats rumoured ,actually happens,then at the end of next season Nat 2,Nat 3 North and South,will become 3 leagues of Nat 2 North,Mid and South,with less travelling but also less RFU funding.
They also want to reduce Nat One to 12 teams so 4 are to be relegated at the end of next season into the Nat 2 leagues.
It appears this is what the RFU and Rob Andrew want for England,2 fully professional leagues of 12 teams,but is it whats best for the club game or do they really care about the lower leagues??

 merlin
 Posts : 2433
 merlin
  Posted 30/03/2008 03:09:43 PM
Send a private message to merlin
I'll be backing Cinderford to beat their North counterpart in the playoff place!.

Mounts Bay Rugby---Pride Of Penzance & Newlyn
 Bay
 Posts : 2668
 Bay
  Posted 30/03/2008 05:14:13 PM
Send a private message to Bay
I think it all depends on who can bring in the most loan players for that play off game dont you.

 DaveH
 Posts : 2478
 DaveH
  Posted 31/03/2008 03:25:56 AM
Send a private message to DaveH
Just an idle thought on my part, initially set in motion by a Pz01 posting on another forum.

Crowds are much bigger in the North. I kid you not. I have just looked at the figures for this season on the NCA website: South 52,8095, North 337648! (I think someone pressed the wrong key - probably 33,648 or 37,648.)

The points gap between second and thirteenth places is about half in Nat3N what it is in Nat3S.

In terms of who will win the play off, the home side will be at a big advantage - but travel will be much easier for Darlington MP if Cinderford are runners-up. Fylde might just slip in ahead of DMP, in which case travel is easier again.

Pirate Pig, the RFU will, I am sure, do what is best for the RFU game.

Bay, no.  

--Last edited by DaveH on 2008-03-31 03:30:16 --

I would give my right arm to be ambidextrous.
 cheshire exile
 Posts : 277
 National League 1
 cheshire exile
  Posted 01/04/2008 01:49:42 PM
Send a private message to cheshire exile
Rob Andrew and RFU care about lower leagues?

The Ku Klux Klan care more about racial harmony.

keep the faith.

forum Forum index forumOther Clubs forumNat 3 N v S
top
Go to :
  Add a quick reply

Add a quick reply